Vai al contenuto

Bare

Utente Registrato
  • Numero contenuti pubblicati

    2290
  • Iscritto il

  • Ultima visita

  • Giorni Massima Popolarità

    6

Tutti i contenuti di Bare

  1. What makes it different to a multi energy STLA Large? Not to mention that already 1.5 GSE with "just" 130 HP has better performance than 1.2 136 HP PureDreck.
  2. Less? 😱 Already the Avenger is really small on the inside.
  3. Well... This is prime example of PSA's stinginess. Mechanic or great mechanical solutions were never on their ethos. Their PR is trying to iron this out. How great there are and so on. On the other hand no one from media outlets is questioning this. Sort of win-win for PSA.
  4. On the other hand people at Rimac are expecting to work for PSA. They're cheapest on the market and one of the best. They have contracts for BMW and so on. PSA is doing on all cheap so Rimac seems like a logical solution. But then PSA is known to push with French suppliers. We'll see...
  5. Turbo GSE can't be fitted inside of CMP based cars. Maybe 1.0 turbo but for sure not 1.3 or 1.5. I think that French people do not care much about reliability. Or French car makers do not care much about it. They're sure that French people will continue buying their products. French people are very nationally conscious.
  6. I'm not so sure that GSE will stay in LATAM. They have plans for electrification.
  7. C'mon, they even didn't do such an easy work as Uconnect for CMP or turbo Firefly for CMP (not even for Brazil). For me that's very lazy on development side. Or at least stingy. Not to mention that dimensions of CMP cars are almost the same. There is no different wheelbase, car height, etc. You have B SUV and all are the same. I mean, Jeep Avenger has a height of a tall hatchback.
  8. This is not a classic DCT. Unfortunately I can't find the article which I've posted on this forum a long time ago. I think that I've posted it. This is not a classic DCT. We can talk about single clutch transmission with additional e-clutch. The wet-clutch, six-speed DCA is different from a conventional dual-clutch transmission (DCT) by the virtue of its separately-placed clutches, as well as a single layshaft unlike the DCT‘s two or three units. The patented new way of realising the dual clutch principle offers seamless DCT shifting, while using 35 percent less shifting components. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.autocarpro.in/news-national/punch-powertrains-compact-dct-system-debuts-with-tata-altroz-81412%3famp=1 Vitesco iz German company based in Regensburg.
  9. This is not classic DCT. Actually this is a single clutch transmissio. And that's all folks Usual PSA way of doing things. Cheap as possible Not very advanced Performance is not imortant Engineering is outsourced Production is done by PSA
  10. What's so good with this new 1.2 PureTech. From that I've seen based on aperformance level it can't hold a candle for 1.5 FireFly. It's sad to see abandonment of a superior engine.
  11. 2 is market segment? So they are a bit of inconsistent or not? STLA Medium based Lancia D segment product has number 4 while for exaplme next gen Giulia and Stelvio on STLA Large have number 5... Can you list all body codes/project under the new nomenclature in appropriate thread. All in the one place
  12. Lancia versions had hemispherical combustion chamber?
  13. I must once again said that Stellantis did a lazy job with so called CMP 2. Anyway, what does '2' in the name means? They did not redo platform for FCA infotainment system. They did not made it suitable for FCA engines. I know that PSA want it cheap and sources in house. But was it so hard to make this car suitable for 1.5 MHEV engine? Engine which is ready au contraire to 1.2 MHEV solution from PSA which also has dubious choice of transmission. It's not double clutch even if they call it that way. And one simple thing. They did all of this products with shortest available wheelbase length. Why?
  14. Also Avenger has dad lesser measured cargo space than 500X. It's the worst in the class. CMP has many drawbacks, many tehcnical drawbacks. The only advantage is price.
  15. I'm wondering if anything on PSA mechanics can replace FCA products. 😂 I mean, so poorly engineered, cost cuts at every step and so on. BTW. There is none 4 cylinder GSE on CMP based products, not even in Brazil. It just doesn't fit. I presume it's due to position of ancillaries.
  16. Airflow was back at the drawing board due to regulation changes related to subsidize for BEV cars and SUVs. It's related to a ground clearance. Original Airflow has low ground clearance and thus was legally a car and not an SUV.
  17. Most likely Wrangler will keep its unique platform/frame
×
×
  • Crea Nuovo...

 

Stiamo sperimentando dei banner pubblicitari a minima invasività: fai una prova e poi facci sapere come va!

Per accedere al forum, disabilita l'AdBlock per questo sito e poi clicca su accetta: ci sarai di grande aiuto! Grazie!

Se non sai come si fa, puoi pensarci più avanti, cliccando su "ci penso" per continuare temporaneamente a navigare. Periodicamente ricomparità questo avviso come promemoria.