Bare
Utente Registrato
-
Iscritto il
-
Ultima visita
-
It's way too narrow.
-
-
-
-
@Osv I think that website you linked it is under the pay wall and from what I know the author has started to write for another site which is of course under the pay wall.
-
-
500X? Wasn't 500X II planned as a proper fully fledged C segment SuV?
-
Guys. PSA 1.2 still has an extremely poor image and there is no chain which will fix it.
-
-
Audi... BMW on their C segment cars have an independent rear suspension. And that's it. For those who are mentioning STLA One. It's a multi energy platform for a C segment cars and low born / elongated D segment cars. It's not for a proper D segment car platform and it's a FWD based. STLA Large LP3 which was fortunately cancel was born as BEV only and thanks God it's cancelled. Then we got back to root of problem in my opinion. Next to a cost cutting ex PSA ehm STLA had a very bad product planning. Their delusions are ithwith small engines, BEV only or BEV first car launches has a long effect on a company. A very bad one.
-
@cruzmaltino I have my doubts that Brasil will see STLA M products. Doesn't make sense. My money is on STLA One.
-
If the new "Giulietta" is a hatchback then this one is also a hatchback. The truth is. Both are crossovers.
-
Coop... Whatever should have an all new V8.
-
Mu biggest concern is interior width. Every CMO and every smart car suffers from narrowness at the shoulder height. Renault did it much better with CMF-B based products. And I see Dacia's proportions as better. It's a more planted car. JMO
-
