Bare
Utente Registrato
-
Iscritto il
-
Ultima visita
Tutti i contenuti di Bare
-
-
No... The new engines will be 1.2 I3 Tce and 1.5 I4 Tce. Actually these engines already exist as naturally aspirated for many years now. They are produced by Nissan. Diesel engines will live in commercial Renault vehicles but they said that they will live for passenger cars if market wants them.
-
-
-
-
Moose test is not for the dynamic qualities of a car. It's something else. PSA doesn't have good driving qualities. Actually far from it. And their technical base is for several reasons lacking for a proper Alfa Romeo. Not just set-up. It's lacking both in suspension typology and materials. To this day Giulietta is more advanced in suspension department than all compact EMP2 cars. Nuff said.
-
-
Usage of PSA platforms is a step towards the darkest age of Alfiats. I'm talking about cars like 145/146, 155 and MiTo. Cars which had zero Alfa's DNA. This is the way to kill Alfa Romeo brand. If eVMP is based on EMP2 then it brings all of drawbacks into a game. No independent rear suspension, no front aluminum suspension, very long nose which gives unpleasant side proportions, tiny rear bench leg room... It only brings BEV option but every platform could receive BEV platform if they want to do it. Small Wide BEV? I haven't heard about it. Who knows, maybe they'll give a green light to it. Dunno.
-
-
-
Ouch! As always with EMP2 even this EMP2 v3 seems to have very little rear leg room. In addition to this every EMP2 car has a very long, even too long nose, which gives unpleasant side look.
- 245 risposte
-
-
- 1
-
-
- ds
- ds 4
- ds 4 cross
- ds automobiles
-
Taggato come:
-
-
-
-
Dodge has 4 or 5 new cars in the cards. And that's it. It could end up with sedan, Coupe and 2 or 3 SUVs. I don't know how many of them are green lit. The one of them will be in production in less than 18 months. I can say as much. Future of Dodge is not dependent on PSA. They are 100% FCA products.
-
-
It's a very interesting article. A lot is truth. And the part where they say that the Alfa is the biggest sounds nice. I would like to be true. In general speech about Alfa Romeo. I was always for Alfa Romeo B-SUV and for C segment Alfas on FWD platforms. Giorgio for C-segment is a non sense. But Alfa shouldn't be just a rebadged Pug, it must offer something more for a driver. IMO, with just Alfa style and badge the risking disasters such as Alfiat 155 or Mito. In the past we had proper FWD Alfas like 147 and 156, I would even add Giulietta to this list. They must be a guide. Alfa B-SUV? If it offers Limited Slip Differential, adjustable suspension, and 1.5 turbo with 200+ HP as options it's fine. Who would ask for more? But id it stops at 1.2 turbo with 130 HP, no LSD and no adjustable suspension it's nothing more than a Pug 2008 or Opel Mokka. It's a lipstick on a pig.
-
-
And how many Grand Cherokees? Contrary to what @lukka1982said, based from what I've gathered Dodge will abandon LX and will focus on their own fork of Giorgio platform which internally is bearing a very interesting name. It should provide these E-segment models. And for sure there will be additional Dodge entry level model. I can not say more although I know all technicalities, production site and start of production date. It's on FCA platform.
-
-
-
-
-
3 billions? It can't be. Even the all new factory for the WL75 and WL74 didn't cost that much. It was $1.6 billion which is around €1.3 billion. Redeveloping JNAP from a WK2 (Mercedes ML) platform to a Giorgio Global will cost $900 million which is around €740 million. So combined investment for 2 plants was around €2 billion euros. So @GinaCostanza76got something wrong or he brought something more into calculations.
-
