pumadog
Utente Registrato
-
Iscritto il
-
Ultima visita
Tutti i contenuti di pumadog
-
-
Might be. But some points are not about sportiness: 280 hp PHEV: "Doesn't feel like 280 hp at all". And now others have electric ranges up to 100 km. The Tonale has 60–70 km, the 3008 (195 hp) has around 85 km 130/160 hp MHEV: The DCT/engine interaction is rough with hiccups. I don't know if the comments are excessive. But when the Tonale is the last surviving vehicle on Small Wide and GSE, it might be advantageous to switch engines for the remaining three years? If they stick to the claim "only BEV from 2027".
-
I think it would benefit from new engines. The EB3 hybrid eDCT is rated much better by journalists than the 130 hp DCT combination in the Tonale, the new 1.6 PHEV in the 3008 offers much bigger electric range. The powertrains are regarded as the weak spot of Tonale in many reports I saw. And all models that share the 1.3/1.5 GSE powertrains will be gone next year, I think?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I don't think we have better knowledge or are smarter than the management. And I believe Tavares says things for a reason, to get some things moving. The current numbers are the result of keeping high post-covid-prices (= margins) in a slowing market as long as possible. They have to adjust now, like Citroën already did for their entire range. If I was CEO, I would have planned to close DS and Lancia from the beginning, and move Abarth under Fiat again. I think Chrysler and Dodge just need product. For Maserati has to be decided if it intends to be real luxury or high specced premium. Do they need high capacity by FCA/STLA or exclusive craftmanship by Ferrari? Moving down to D segment was a failure anyway.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I think the absence of the grille doesn't do the latest Volvo designs any favour.
- 64 risposte
-
-
- 1
-
-
- bev
- ex90
- ex90 2023
- volvo ex90
-
Taggato come:
-
-
-
-
-
-
I prefer the exterior of the R5, these Alpine additions clash with the original lines. The side "intakes" are just corny. But I like the interior upgrades. While the R5 is fine, this adds some premium feel – in the front and back. Better than materials of the Junior. 170 km/h isn't much for a "racer". When a sub-brand car is based so clearly on a main-brand car, why give it a different name? I think it's confusing. What does 290 mean? Why not A5 or something similar?
