Se la FIA fosse una federazione seria e con le palle, strapperebbe la superlicenza all'inglese.

Ma visto che è comandata da un masochista e dal sosia di Andy Wharol, non farà niente.

Il vecchio Balestre, vent'anni fa, a Senna la superlicenza minaccio' di revocarla per molto meno... Balestre alla fine son riusciti a silurarlo. Quando, questi altri due?

eh speriamo al più presto!! stanno rovinando del tutto uno sport nobile come la Formula 1

che barba che noia che brba che noia...

comunque la gufata a luigi ha avuto i suoi effetti

che barba che noia che brba che noia...

comunque la gufata a luigi ha avuto i suoi effetti

e mi sa di si 8)

ma vedere luigino dietro resta sempre una soddisfazione

eh speriamo al più presto!! stanno rovinando del tutto uno sport nobile come la Formula 1

EDIT: detta una boiata, campate pure via!

Modificato 2 Aprile 200916 anni fa da TonyH

>> Dal sito FIA <<

Press Release

Stewards Decision - Australian GP

02/04/2009

PENALTY IMPOSED ON DRIVER NO 1 LEWIS HAMILTON AND COMPETITOR VODAFONE MCLAREN MERCEDES

SUMMARY OF KEY CONSIDERATIONS

At the first hearing following the Australian Grand Prix the Stewards did not have the benefit of the radio exchanges between driver No 1 Lewis Hamilton and his Team Vodafone McLaren Mercedes nor did they have access to the comments to the Media given by Lewis Hamilton immediately after the end of the race.

From the video recordings available to the Stewards during the hearing it appeared that Jarno Trulli’s car left the track and car No 1 moved into third place. It then appeared that Trulli overtook Hamilton to regain third place, which at the time was prohibited as it was during the Safety Car period.

During the hearing, held approximately one hour after the end of the race, the Stewards and the Race Director questioned Lewis Hamilton and his Team Manager David Ryan specifically about whether there had been an instruction given to Hamilton to allow Trulli to overtake. Both the driver and the Team Manager stated that no such instruction had been given. The Race Director specifically asked Hamilton whether he had consciously allowed Trulli to overtake. Hamilton insisted that he had not done so.

The new elements presented to the Stewards several days after the 2009 Australian Grand Prix which led to the reconvened Stewards Meeting clearly show that:

a. Immediately after the race and before Lewis Hamilton attended the Stewards Meeting he gave an interview to the Media where he clearly stated that the Team had told him to let Trulli pass.

b. Furthermore, the radio exchanges between the driver and the Team contain two explicit orders from the Team to let the Toyota pass.

The Stewards, having learned about the radio exchanges and the Media interview, felt strongly that they had been misled by the driver and his Team Manager which led to Jarno Trulli being unfairly penalised and Lewis Hamilton gaining third place.

ma vedere luigino dietro resta sempre una soddisfazione